[PeteBooth]

I still prefer wood to metal but here is what I have noticed in umpiring a few wood bat tournaments this year.

The games in terms of lenght of time is not that significant. Here's what I have noticed and wanted your experiences.

The coaches approach to a wood bat game is entriely different than with metal. For the most part (unless you have a really good stud F1), the coaches approach with metal bats is that his team will need to score more than 2-4 runs to win. Not as much small ball and the hitters since they have a metal bat swing the bats more freely.

When wood is used, the coach wants his hitters to be more patient and plays more small ball. The hitters since they only use wood on occassions such as tournaments are not as comfortable and therefore are not as "free swinging" as they would be with a metal bat.

Therefore, for the most part I haven't noticed any real significance in time savings from metal to wood. More deeper counts with wood then with metal.

Perhaps if wood were adopted permanetly, then the batters would get used to it and the game would move along, however, when most of the players use metal for the HS season etc. and only use wood on special occassions, the lenght of the games is not all that significant.

Don't get me wrong I still prefer wood bat games but the point I was making is that I have not noticed any significance in time savings unless you have really good F1's. But when you have really good F1's the game moves quickly whether wood or metal is used.

What have you noticed?

Pete Booth