[PeteBooth]

Originally posted by Doug

i have found a question is always best anwsered w/ a question. "why was that obstruction" "coach what is obstruction". I used it during the bb season and it worked great! coach: " why wasn't that goal tending" official "coach, what is goal tending". try it

Doug I agree with Carl and Rich. I do not know where you are from but if you try that in my area, your lucky if you will be assigned a TEE Ball game for your next assignment.

Doesn't matter what do not answer a question with a question.

My advice would be to simply say:

"Coach IN MY JUDGEMENT, F6 was not in the act of making a play and hindered r2's progress, which is obstruction. I will not get into a debate, etc. with the coach as I do not want to slow down the game. A simple precise answer and it's time to Play ball. The coach might not agree with me (which is normal), but at least I took the time to explain what I saw and knew what Obstruction is.

IMO, an umpire needs to know why he / she is enforcing a certain penalty and be able to explain it, otherwise why call it.

When you respond by answering the coach with a question IMO it: (a) could be a sign that you are trying to show up the coach or (b) you really don't know the rule yourself so your are trying to weasel your way out of any confrontation.

I'm surprised you haven't been burned using your suggestion. My gut tells me if you keep using it, eventually lightening will strike

Pete Booth