Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
That's an unfair, unneeded imo advanatage. The violation the defense committed is now two-fold. You ensured they kept the ball (violation - which carries it's own penality) and the AP. That's like double jeopardy, convicting me for the same crime twice.
|
So based on that - If under NFHS rules Player A1 has the ball and B1 reaches out in shoves him and the official calls the foul INTENTIONAL - Penalty two shot and team A gets the Ball ...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
That's an unfair, unneeded imo advanatage. .... That's like double jeopardy, convicting me for the same crime twice.
|
Team A has the ball and the coach on team A didn't like your lack of a call on a rebound and stands up and Calls you a good for nothing MF Arse who's heratige is in serious question as to being human and you "T" him up ... .
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Old School
That's an unfair, unneeded imo advanatage. .... That's like double jeopardy, convicting me for the same crime twice.
|
It seems to come down to a situation where you do not like the rule.
I do not like the Jumpstop rule
but I deal with it ...
I actually have become very good at calling it and getting it right - That would be how most healthy people deal with these type of things other wise it eats you up inside and you become old and jaded