Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BayStateRef
I tried to answer your question earlier. See Post No. 40. (Quick summary: the IAABO manual has much better graphics in full color, is better written and its typography and design make it easier to read.)
If I could figure out how to post an image, I would show you a specific example from the IAABO manual and the Fed manual.
|
I now have an IAABO manual. The graphics are a little better. I don't generally agree though that, overall, it is better-written and and the typography/design makes it easier to read too. The basic content is still the same in both of them.
Can you give some explicit examples between the two that I can compare?
Btw, manuals don't teach. Teachers teach from manuals. If IAABO/NFHS mechanics are the same, what are IABBO clinicians generally doing better than NFHS clinicians when it comes to teaching those identical mechanics? They're both teaching using the same material, right? That's what I'm trying to find out.