Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
Can I call this one QED now?
|
Beats me. What are you QED'ing? I haven't chimed in on this because I think it's really just messed up in the book. The case play 4.41.4B flat-out contradicts rule 5-2-1. If you made me guess, I believe the rules committee wants the case play to have priority and that 5-2-1 is simply poorly written.
However, as written, the scenario in the original post of this thread is scored as three points.