Quote:
|
Originally Posted by charliej47
 When you state the Rulebook is wrong and then quote the Rulebook to justify your statements, aren't you using a circler argument? |
No, this isn't circular logic at all. Circular logic would be this: the rule book is wrong because it says it is wrong (not that this makes much sense). A better example would be the reverse: the rulebook is right because it says it is right.