Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
A runner who was already put out who draws a throw is an example of interference. F3 made the judgment error because R2 was behaving like he was still a runner in the game. Thus, the runner closest to home (R1) is out. Again, 8-7-P. Read the note below it.  |
I believe what Dave is asking is, was there actually a play with which the act caused interference.
The rule note states that drawing a throw MAY be INT, not that it actually is INT. The rule states the the act has to INT with the defense's ability to make a play on another runner. If there were no other runner's moving, or in jeopardy, there was no play with which to INT.
Modified to change reference
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Thu May 24, 2007 at 01:06pm.
|