View Single Post
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 03:10pm
chartrusepengui chartrusepengui is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
I'm not the one confused here. I agree that intentional fouls are never flagrant fouls and that is why we cannot change the terminology. However - intentional fouls can appear to be flagrant. This argument is the same as those earlier that argue about the "intent" of a foul. Some flagrant fouls can appear to be "intentional", yet by rule cannot be. How is changing terminology going to solve anything? If you say that by changing terminology more officials are going to "make the call" then they are the ones confused. Are you one of those officials? I'm not - I have no problem making the calls and seeing the difference between them. My whole point is that changing the terminology will not change how officials make the call.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote