Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
a "flagrant foul" level one is also not a name befitting an intentional foul where the intent is obvious. JMO but the point you make can be argued both ways. Right? Now splitting the name ie adding flagrant foul level one and keeping the intentional foul might actually be the way to go to get the officials to call these fouls more consistently.
|
Not really splitting hairs because "
intentional" clearly implies that there is intent as part of the foul. Flagrant doesn't. It only implies that the foul is something beyond normal.