View Single Post
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 12:05pm
chartrusepengui chartrusepengui is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
a "flagrant foul" level one is also not a name befitting an intentional foul where the intent is obvious. JMO but the point you make can be argued both ways. Right? Now splitting the name ie adding flagrant foul level one and keeping the intentional foul might actually be the way to go to get the officials to call these fouls more consistently.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote