View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 11, 2007, 11:06am
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigGuy
The bat hitting the ball in and of itself is not automatically INT if it does not actually interfere with a fielder's ability to make a play.

From 7-3-6

ART. 6... If the bat breaks and is hit by the ball or hits a runner or a fielder, no interference shall be called. If a whole bat is thrown and interferes with a defensive player attempting a play, interference will be called.

You as umpire have to judge that there was in fact INT.
I'm not sure, but I think the intent of the rule you quoted involves bats that go flying out of a batter's hands; not simply a dropped bat.

If a batter hits a slow roller in front of the plate and simply drops his bat (in a normal manner), and the catcher stumbles over the bat as he goes out to field the ball, I would probably not call interference on the batter as I would if the bat went flying out of his hands and the shortstop had to be concerned with getting clobbered while trying to field a grounder.

The batter is under no obligation to discard his bat in a certain location. What he cannot do, however, is:
1) Fling his bat (whether intentional or not) in such a way as to complicate a fielding attempt, or
2) Drop his bat in such a way as to intentionally complicate the catcher's attempt to make a play on a batted ball, or
3) Drop/throw his bat and make direct contact with a fair ball.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote