View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 05, 2007, 08:55pm
DTQ_Blue DTQ_Blue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 164
I ruled interference not because of the missed throw, but because the batter's presence in the box altered the pitcher's path of approach to cover the plate. The pitcher was forced to go more to her left because of the batter's presence in the box (batter was RH). The pitcher's approach to home to get into position to make that play should have been unimpeded.
Reply With Quote