View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 03, 2007, 12:56pm
blueump blueump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
Can you explain how the coach "obstructed"? There was no contact with any players, he did not affect any play, there was not even any "verbal interference". Per Rule 2-22 obstruction is an act that "hinders a runner or changes a pattern of play as in 5-1-3 and 8-3-2. According to your post, none of these things happened. By simply being in fair territory during a live ball you called an obstruction?

I totally disagree MC. I think this was handled totally wrong. I would have at the least given a very strict warning to the coach, or restricted him to the dugout for the remainder of the game, but his actions from what I've read, did nothing to obstruct anyone!
__________________
"When I umpire I may not always be right, but I am always final!"
Reply With Quote