[AtlUmpSteve]

Sorry for the poor choice of words. You have not offended me. You have gone off on a few tangents in prior threads, but nothing that was a personal matter. Those have been civil discussions, and your viewpoints have been supportable, even if incorrect. There are times I think you perhaps might step back and try harder to understand the viewpoints of a few of us who are in the rules process, where we have insight you may not see in the final wording; but, that is not a reason for me to be offended, nor to intentionally insult you. You are grouped, in this case, by your responses to this thread.

On the other hand, I have consciously avoided addressing any thread where Jimpiano has acted the part of a troll. This time, I somewhat agree with his interpretation of the rule, although not his stated remedy. So, agreeing with him (and thus, you) pains me. I feel the need to contribute this time, despite wanting to avoid his threads, because I see a slide toward what I believe to be the wrong interpretation.