Thread: Self bat
View Single Post
  #163 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 01, 2007, 08:41am
just another ref just another ref is offline
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
4.15.4 SIT E b:since the ball did not touch the floor, the tossing and subsequent catch is an illegal dribble.

The argument that the OP is not a violation seems to be based on the idea that the catch ends the dribble. True enough: 4.15.4.a The dribble ends when the dribbler......catches the ball.

SO, why in the above situation did the catch, which ends the dribble,
not prevent a violation?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
The case play says that the player throws the ball into the air - therefore, he had control and his previous dribble had ended.
He had control, yes, but we don't know whether he had previously dribbled or not. It doesn't matter. Either way this is a violation.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote