Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rfp
Why don't we keep the intentional foul for "on purpose" fouls, and come up with a new foul type, and mechanic, for "excessive contact" fouls? Lumping them together seems to be a source of confusion for coaches, fans and officials.
|
Hmmmmmmm.........
Not a bad idea actually imo. Same penalty, but one signal for "not playing the ball" and another signal for "excessive, non-flagrant contact". Makes sense. Signals are supposed to convey information.