Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Speaking ASA
This is INT, old or new rules, makes no difference. As the BU, I would only call it if I believe my partner did not see the kick due to his/her vision being blocked by the catcher or batter, or not even looking at the time.
|
Agree. This is clearer by the new wording, but should have been judged interference by the old wording. It is clear that the action resulted in hindering the defense's opportunity to make the play.
Only make the original call if I think PU did not see it at all, not if he saw it and misapplied or misjudged. When/if we conference about it, I am absolutely telling PU that is interference, and to amke the call.