Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
Fair enough.. I did misunderstand the intent of the article as a whole. So as to the article, I change my argument to "objection, lack of foundation."
|
Your very thread on the topic provides foundation. Is it a change where action that previously was not interference now is? You say so. NUS says not. Therefore, either you misunderstand the change, or the NUS is recognizing what they have wrought and are trying by "clarification" to undo it. Either way, it is evidence of a rule change process that is FUBARed.