Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
That is hyperbole that has little merit IMO.
|
What hyperbole does? That is was hype is obvious. That is was not a serious comparison was also obvious. At least I thought so.
You made a defense of the rule wording change in another thread whereby you stated that it would change the way interference was SUPPOSED to be called. Yet, the NUS says no change. Yet, you think it is good. Go figure. Your thread nearly makes my case on this.