Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
So, where do you come up with this "fact"? Do you have this "fact" in writing from ASA, or NFHS, or a bat manufacturer? Because, that would contradict and violate the ASA statement that bats must pass the ASA 2004 bat standard to be legal in championship play, as well as the contract between ASA and the manufacturers that all bats be presented for testing.
This whole "fact" that confirms your point is total speculation on your part; and you wouldn't have said "if", if you knew otherwise. How can you speculate about a "fact" that is the premise of your point?
|
Simple. It is not possible for a bat to have passed in 2001 a test that did not exist until 2004. Obviously, all those bats with "approval" dates before 2004 were NOT submitted to the 2004 test. They were merely grandfathered.