Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
If it is a fact that the "approved list" contains bats that have NOT been tested to the ASA 2004 BPS, only bats that ASA has approved for championship play, that does two things.
1) It confirms my point about ASA and what is legal for championship play, their broad statements notwithstanding, and,
2) It makes me question how NFHS can square that list with their rule, which simply states that the bat has to have passed the 2004 BPS. IOW, the rule from NFHS says one thing and the guidelines say another.
|
So, where do you come up with this "fact"? Do you have this "fact" in writing from ASA, or NFHS, or a bat manufacturer? Because, that would contradict and violate the ASA statement that bats must pass the ASA 2004 bat standard to be legal in championship play, as well as the contract between ASA and the manufacturers that all bats be presented for testing.
This whole "fact" that confirms your point is total speculation on your part; and you wouldn't have said "if", if you knew otherwise. How can you speculate about a "fact" that is the premise of your point?