|
If it is a fact that the "approved list" contains bats that have NOT been tested to the ASA 2004 BPS, only bats that ASA has approved for championship play, that does two things.
1) It confirms my point about ASA and what is legal for championship play, their broad statements notwithstanding, and,
2) It makes me question how NFHS can square that list with their rule, which simply states that the bat has to have passed the 2004 BPS. IOW, the rule from NFHS says one thing and the guidelines say another.
__________________
Tom
|