Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WestMichBlue
Your position is that 100% of all bats carrying a 2000 mark are either on the approved or non-appproved list. To prove your position you state that no one ever gave you a bat model that is not on one of those lists. Of course that does not prove a fact, it only reinforces your personal opinion.
Twice in writing you have set forth your challenge. I assume that if a single bat meets your challenge, that your 100% position will be destroyed.
OK - Dakota did just that. Provided a bat model with 2000 mark not on either list. Now what? Recant? or wiggle?
Question:
Is Dakota's bat legal for ASA Championship play according to the ASA rule book?
Is it legal according to the ASA website?
Is it legal for NFHS play?
WMB
|
The C555 is not the model number; it was a Louisville Slugger marketing name/number, such as many other bats provide, part of a series which also included baseball bats. The proper model number is SB20, according to my research, and it is on the ASA Approved bat list.
Louisville Slugger SB20 approved 5/29/2001
So, yes, legal for ASA championship play.
Yes, legal according to the ASA website.
Yes, legal for NFHS play.
Yes, even a single bat would blow a hole into the process, but it has to be a legitimate bat model number. Not suggesting Dakota intentionally mislead, but that wasn't the model number. If such a bat does exist, then is no wiggle room; I would admit my mistake, and recant my position.