Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
Finally, I repeat and renew my challenge from the NFHS website. I challenge any one umpire, from anywhere in the USA, to name even one bat model that has the 2000 cert, yet does not appear on either the approved bat list nor the non-approved bat list. WMB "assumes" they exist; I challenge anyone to name one.
Until that challenge is met, I "assume" that the process is as complete as is stated, and do not subject NFHS teams to redundant means of proving it. Nor will I continue to repost my position with the same responses to the same assumptions. Name me one bat that supports your position.
|
Your position is that 100% of all bats carrying a 2000 mark are either on the approved or non-appproved list. To prove your position you state that no one ever gave you a bat model that is not on one of those lists. Of course that does not prove a
fact, it only reinforces your personal opinion.
Twice in writing you have set forth your challenge. I assume that if a
single bat meets your challenge, that your
100% position will be destroyed.
OK - Dakota did just that. Provided a bat model with 2000 mark
not on either list. Now what? Recant? or wiggle?
Question:
Is Dakota's bat legal for ASA Championship play according to the ASA rule book?
Is it legal according to the ASA website?
Is it legal for NFHS play?
WMB