Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
So now umpires are going overboard and considering a cross-eyed look as interference since it startled the poor defender. OK, clearly hype there, but definitive action to interfere is not the same thing as any slight movement that somehow got in the way maybe.
|
I think it would be more accurate to state: definitive action THAT interferes.
The word "to" implies intent, which of course, is not required.