Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcrowder
Intent to break up a double play is still interference - both this year and last year. I see no difference in the call on this play between LY and TY. I have INT LY and TY if (HTBT) I felt there was intent on the runner's part to break up a possible DP.
You seem to have a difference on thsi play between TY and LY, but you don't explain why - can you explain?
|
Boy you went at that backasswards..
Because obviously...
You dont need "Intent to break up a double play" for their to be INT.
Intent was removed from the rule and it is not used in determining INT.
Your entire opinion last year hinged on determining the retired runners intent.
You're saying that hasnt changed for you this year and you would respond to the scenario the same?
Maybe you need to reexamine what ASA is looking for if you think intent is a prerequisite.