Thread: When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent
View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2007, 07:56am
mcrowder mcrowder is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
Really?
Cause I got INT this year, scenario taken at face value.
Intent to break up a double play is still interference - both this year and last year. I see no difference in the call on this play between LY and TY. I have INT LY and TY if (HTBT) I felt there was intent on the runner's part to break up a possible DP.

You seem to have a difference on thsi play between TY and LY, but you don't explain why - can you explain?
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote