Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greymule
is subject to a successful appeal.
"Unless he corrects his mistake" is so obvious it does not have to be written.
Batter hits a ball over the outfield and touches, in order, home, 2B, 1B, 3B, and claims he scored a run. I think even the Ninth Circuit would choke on that one.
|
I am simply following earlier advice on this board that asked for the rule(s) as written to be cited.
It may be logical to assume that a runner missing a base and then touching it when returning, or missing it both ways, could not be subject to a successful appeal.....but where is that interpretation written?