Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
What rule proves me wrong?
What that I said does it prove wrong?
What rule proves you right?
What that you said does it prove right?
|
The argument is simple.
The test question ignored the IFR.( if you can argue with a straight face that a bases loaded pop fly near the foul line high enough to allow the batter to interfere with the first baseman AFTER the runner has scored without invoking the infield fly rule then you can be a great fiction writer.)
Therefore the test question was constructed to get the anwer it wanted wihout regard to reality.
The test question is simply not what happens in real life.
What happens in real life is covered by the existing rules. Why you argue otherwise is a mystery.
The question would make sense if you removed the runner from second base.
It makes no sense with the bases loaded.