[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

Not what the rule says.

And remember this was predicated on the rule book, not common sense.


Rule 8-2 Batter-Runner is out:

F. When the batter-runnner interferes with:....a fielder attempting to field a batter ball.

Okay, this one comes under N.S.S. The rule you cite allows the umpire who believes (uh-oh, here comes that intent thing again) call the runner closest to home out if s/he believed it prevented a double play. R1 is NOT the runner closest to home. R1 has scored and is no longer a participant in the play.

I When an infield fly is DECLARED.

Another N.S.S.

In this case the batter/runner by continuing to run can be called for interference since the fielder is near the base line.

The rule you are citing (retired running) refers to drawing a throw.

Whether the ball is fair or foul is immaterial to the penalty...Remember the case cited said interferernce to break up a double play:

And you get the 2nd out, it just isn't R1.

If the ball is fair the already out batter was guilty of interference, by definition, when he continued to run after being declared out

Again, the "continuing to run" is not applicable as it isn't drawing a throw

...and, if foul, would be guilty of interference by 8-2-f . In either case the umpire would be justifed in calling the runner nearest the plate out.

Again, we are back to N.S.S. That is exactly the answer given by ASA on the test. At the time of the INT the runner closest to home is R2.

I think this is a good example of how answering a narrowly drawn question, while getting the correct answer, does not necessarily mean that, under the same circumstances in a real game, there would not be a reason to make another ruling.

Sorry, but it's only a good example of running a thread in circles with extraneous and irrelevant information while demonstrating a lack in rules applications.