Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gazebra
The play should have been reviewed for only the time that it took to blow the whistle, and as a result only .2 or so should have come off. Not that it would have made a difference in the game, but it would allow for at least a better attempt.
|
How can you say that? Why only .2 seconds? Because the announcers said so? Why not .7 or .5?
The officials reviewed the amount of time they felt should have run off the clock. The clock never started. I would expect a second to come off anyway.
Peace