Big:
Why do you keep pointing at Blue 37? You ask why we're not on his case? Maybe it's because he only posted once and he said:
Our State rules guy has stated in our rules meeting the past two years that the "player must have the ball" or it is obstruction. I disagree with that interpretation, but I will do what I am told to do.
Or maybe it's because he doesn't keep come back again and again and again trying to justify the call.
If you want to "go with the flow" in your area, go ahead, but don't be surprised if something bad comes of it some day.
Darn, if you can't take a bit of heat, how/why do you umpire?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
|