Thread: Obstruction?
View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 22, 2007, 01:21pm
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Second, the runner in my opinion slid short and would not have reached home plate in the absence of contact.

The offense will argue that he slid short because the catcher was there - the catcher caused it, therefore it's obstruction.


Second, the catcher did not have possession of the ball. In my judgment that is obstruction and I awarded the runner home plate.

That's not judgement, it is a rules misinterpretation. PROTEST!


You need to learn the game. You need to learn the rules.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote