View Single Post
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 22, 2007, 01:14am
NewNCref NewNCref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Let me be clear: In the OP, I believe that the current NFHS rules are terrible and should be changed.
I don't know about terrible, but I definitely think there needs to be clarification about this (I think a casebook play would be exactly what we need).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
I believe that the current NFHS rules call for the official to advance the ball for the team, if the AP arrow favors them.
Okay, I'm still with you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
I won't do that.
WOAH....you admit what the rules are regarding this, but refuse to enforce them

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
I will fudge this one and say that it falls under an interrupted game, then use 4-36 (POI).
And of course, while we're not going to enforce the correct rule, let's improperly apply another


Your post is completely absurd. What if I said, "The penalty for slapping the backboard (while not attempting to block a shot) is a technical foul. I won't do that. I'll just call it basket interference"? That's absurd! While I may believe that's what the penalty should be, I don't do it.

Maybe we should just all ask Nevada what he thinks the proper rule for everything should be.
Reply With Quote