Thread: Situation #2
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 12, 2007, 04:43pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
Methinks that this seeming contradiction or omission is the exact reason this play was included in the ASA Clarifications - that that ASA is quite clearly telling us what they want called here by including it.
Assuming that B4 became a BR, I agree with their ruling. However, the wording of the scenario leads me to believe that B4 never became a BR, so rule 8 would not apply - rule 7 would.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote