Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WestMichBlue
You keep insinuating that the NFHS has a strange interpretation. NO! It is logical, based on the NFHS Definition of Play RULE.
NCAA's definition of PLAY is the same as ASA, so I don't know why they would have this interpretation.
WMB
|
I acknowledge it is NFHS's interpretation, but help me with the definition part. I don't have the 2007 book yet, but the 2006 book does not address this in the definitions rule. Is it somewhere else?
Also, I was not insinuating anything. I was stating directly that I did not like this interpretation, and the reason why being that it is generally the unskilled defenses that seem to need to throw to 1B to stop the uncontested steal.
I have no problem calling the game the way NFHS wants it called.