Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GarthB
1. The method advocated by rei has been taught at several NCAA level camps I have attended. You may think that it "sucks" if you'd like, but it is one that is used by many at that level. The method I learned from Evans was to judge by the motion of the body, not the bat. I'm sure that "sucks", too.
2. I know rei. I know he has not exaggerated the level of ball he works.
3. I am highly amused reading posts attempting to correct or educate rei written by some who have not and will not reach the level he works.
4. I am equally amused by some who have posted elsewhere, "If I go to my partner right away, he gives me what he has, but if I hesitate or repeat my call, he damn well better give me what I have"; but now insist they would never expect a certain response.
5. Welcome aboard, rei.
|
I agree, the method of determining the "called strike" is what I've also read and been taught; however, for me to try and determine for someone else what is a called strike, that's not a very good approach IMO.
Even at the college level, I've seen umpires who either are very strict or very literal in their approach toward the checked swing. The bottom line is that it is determined by the individual.
At the HS level its even more varied as you have veteran and beginning umpires.
Based on experience, training, etc., that will vary widely.
Thansk
David