Mon Feb 19, 2007, 10:15pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1
Would you favor:
1. Playing the game in 16-minute halves by state association adoption. No, it was done in MN and things get very sloppy at the end of the half. One coach told me he has noticed players getting much more tired than with quarters.
2. Playing the game in 18-minute halves by state association adoption. No
3. Permitting a shot clock by state association adoption. Yes
4. During a free throw, moving all players up one space and leaving the two marked lane spaces closest to the end line vacant (currently spaces nearest the shooter are vacant). Yes
5. After shooting the free throws for a technical foul, putting the ball in play at the point of interruption (currently the ball is awarded to the offended team at half court). Yes
6. Changing to a 20-second interval for replacement of a disqualified player (currently 30-seconds). Yes
7. Adding a fifth delay warning for a team huddling at the sideline during the disqualified player replacement interval. No
8. Stopping the game clock after a successful goal when there is less than one minute remaining in the fourth quarter (or any overtime) and restarting the game clock when the ball is touched inbounds. No, hate to see the attemps at doing that at the lower level games with the variety of clock operators you get.
9. During state championship contests, permitting game officials to use courtside replay equipment to determine if a try for field goal at or near the expiration of time should be counted, and if counted, determine its value, by state association adoption. Yes
|
This is how I will vote.
|