Thread: New Divot
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 18, 2007, 03:41pm
SAump SAump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
The Grand Canal

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Foul. The ball meets the definition of 2.00-Foul without first meeting any of the definitions in 2.00-Fair
Now, say the same situation as the opening post were repeated; except that the ball rolled into the canal created by the pitcher who accidently fell over the baseline in his hurry to get to the ball. The ball changes direction in the canal and veers foul and settles there.

Does that ball meet the definition of 2.00-Foul without first meeting any of the definitions in 2.00-Fair? I now suppose the only reply necessary would be if the initial ruling were any different. Please provide source.

Last edited by SAump; Sun Feb 18, 2007 at 03:44pm.