Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheWhiteShadow
2.16.1.D has almost the exact same scenario but it is ruled foul and it states that the "bat is considered to be part of the playing field".
(Originally this said 2.16.1.C, but that was a typo as I really meant 2.16.1.D).
|
I vehemently disagree.
Edited to meekishly apologize, upon reading the words from our moderator below.
I was going into some "hands are part of the bat and the bat is part of the playing field, so the hands are now part of the playing field too" type of argument. Chalk it up to my inexperience and the dilemma presented to us by FEDlandia.