|
It's very difficult to judge, in this forum, whether the call should have been made, or if the contact was severe enough. That's Chuck's call. Same for the T, IMO. But if Chuck thought it COULD have been called, A's coach probably thought it SHOULD have been called as well, and it sounds like B's coach thought it COULD have been called, based on his remark. So Chuck, here's a question.
If A1 was dribbling up the middle of the court and B1 contacted the wrist causing the ball to go wide but NOT OOB, and A1 had to run over and retrieve it, would you have called a foul?
In deciding this play vs. the OOB/throw-in play, note they are different from an advantage/disadvantage view. IMO, the disadvantage that team A would have to pass into 5 on 4 coverage should factor into the decision to some degree.
EG
|