Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greymule
Is the clinician saying that if R1 had touched 2B and then overslid and was tagged, he would be out, but because he missed 2B before the overslide, he is entitled to 2B and can't be tagged out?
|
This is pretty much word for word what he said.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greymule
To take an extreme example, what if the throw had gone into center field and R1 then missed 2B and attempted to make 3B but was tagged out. By this clinician's logic, R1 would be sent back to 2B, never having touched it and now entitled to his award.
|
This was my response as well to which he replied, "In your situation, he's making an attempt for third. That's the difference."
I don't get it. I was wondering if this is some sort of new FED rule.
He challenged me to find a rule that refutes his interpretation. I can't find one in the FED book, but that doesn't mean he's right, a point I made with him last night.