Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Yes, he should have, however:
It's not odd to have both whistles go at the same time, and the L not realizing there was a T whistle due to sound alone. If the T had now lowered his open hand signal, to walk to the L, the L could still be in the dark as to another call.
|
This is why you do not just lower you hand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Which he did.
|
He did not do it in the right manner based on what I read. He allowed his partner to go to the table. Now either his partner was so clueless or he did not make sure his partner saw him originally. Also you have to know to some extent there is a possiblity that your partner might have something. Not always, but most of the time for sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
It might be a good idea for the T to stick with the play and should still see this after-travel contact. S/he should then confirm with the L that the contact he is calling is the same after-travel contact the T observed. This mechanic prevents cases where the T missed contact that the L saw. Granted, this is not needed in all cases, however.
|
What I am talking about takes a second or two. I am not talking about a long drawn out conversation. You likely should also talk about these kinds of situations in the pre-game. Just a short conversation about this tells you and your partner(s) how you will handle this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
I have seen calls botched because the T assumed contact that the L called to be same contact that he saw.
|
True, but I do not think this is that kind of situation.
Peace