View Single Post
  #180 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 02, 2007, 04:08pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgtg19
I don't think this is right. The TRO was issued against the WVSSA (or whatever the initials are). The school was not and is not restrained by that legal proceeding in any way. If the school had tried to do something, too, perhaps Mayo would have sought a TRO against it, but the school itself is not prevented from suspending a player just because he got a TRO against the WVSSA.
I don't know that we know that for a fact but....let's say the school wasn't covered by the TRO. They suspend him. He goes back to court, to the same judge and gets another TRO. What's the point?

Makes no difference, he wasn't going to be suspended this week.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith

Last edited by BktBallRef; Fri Feb 02, 2007 at 04:22pm.