View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 31, 2007, 02:10pm
Scrapper1 Scrapper1 is offline
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes
Very early in my career, I was told at a clinic, that the 5th foul on any player was "flagrant," because it resulted in the DQ of the player, therefore meeting the definition of a "flagrant" foul. How stupid is THAT?
That used to be true for a team member's second T. Regardless of the nature of the second T, it was by definition flagrant. That got removed a few years ago.

I can't remember if it was also true for a 5th personal foul.
Reply With Quote