Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes
Very early in my career, I was told at a clinic, that the 5th foul on any player was "flagrant," because it resulted in the DQ of the player, therefore meeting the definition of a "flagrant" foul. How stupid is THAT?
|
That used to be true for a team member's second T. Regardless of the nature of the second T, it was by definition flagrant. That got removed a few years ago.
I can't remember if it was also true for a 5th personal foul.