View Single Post
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 24, 2007, 07:29pm
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
If I knew extremely minimal information about you, I could run a background check on you at minimal cost. I would not have to get a signed piece of paper from you, and I would not be breaking any laws. ... snip ...
So ... asking you for your permission is truly a moot point. There is no loss of liberty by asking for your permission - I can do it anyway.

... snip ... all I'm saying is that since they can get your info anyway.
1) And that is exactly what is wrong, wrong, wrong

2) Not saying you are wrong, but what you describe is

3) Invading privacy is wrong, hindrance or not, especially without permission. The permission does make a difference.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote