Thread: rusty
View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 18, 2007, 04:04pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi

However, one person presided over the fate of the Chicago 8, and that was Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis, the newly appointed commissioner of MLB. Regardless of the finding of a court of law, Landis chose to ban the players for life.
That's called managing your business. No different than discharging, firing, however you would like to refer as termination of any other employee.

Quote:
Pretty much the same fate that Pete Rose faced, except that Rose chose to be put on the ineligible list if baseball ceased investigating the matter, and to prevent further legal investigation. (Sounds to me as though he had/has something to hide.) Of course, the caveat to that was that after one year he could begin to petition MLB for reinstatement, which he has done, and which has subsequently been denied.
"Legal" investigation? How are you using the term "legal"? MLB can only leverage what they have. The ONLY thing baseball could have done is what they did.

Quote:
I don't agree. MLB baseball, against the advice of many, did not choose to ban "performance enhancing" substances until after the 2002 season.
Another joke, IMO. These alleged enhancement substances do not enhance performance, they enhance the bodies development. What people take exception to is the results, or by-products of that development.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote