Quote:
|
Originally Posted by johnSandlin
This situation involves two teams near the bottom of their league and also neither of these teams like each other to say the very least. Basically a Michigan /Ohio State football type setting.
Also at the time of this situation, both teams are in the bonus whether 1 & 1 or double bonus.
Team A shoots. Rebounding foul called on Team A. Before this foul can be reported....Team A player and Team B player decide they want exchange greetings with each other. I am C and the T both say it and come to get it. Both of us were on the same page with a getting borth players.
We went with a double foul. No problem so far. However, we had the first foul to administer though. At first we were going to clear the free throw lane, shoot the bonus free throws, and go with the P arrow at the point of interuption.
Then, we got to thinking further about the definition of Point of Interuption. We agreed on and went with putting everyone on the free throw lane, shooting the free throws and playing on. We based this decision Rule 4-36 from NFHS. Our thought and decision was based on the fact that the point of interuption was the free throws.
Were we right? What would you have done? Based on reviewing the rulebook after the game, we feel that we handled it correctly.
|
We talked about this situation during an Area meeting, and everyone agreed that the situation goes as follows
Shoot Personal Foul FT by team B
Shoot Technical Fouls in order of occurence
Team A takes ball out at division line
Thats what we agreed on, and thats what was given to us by the KSHSAA Officials Director