Quote:
|
Originally Posted by d1ref2b
Applied as revised:
Team A is awarded a throw in as a result of an AP situation. The throw in is made by Team A, but is intentionally kicked by Team B. Because the ball was not “legally” touched by a player that was inbounds or out of bounds, the AP throw in did not end. Team A would then be awarded a throw in as a result of the kicking violation by Team B, and would not lose the arrow since they did not commit a violation, as references in Rule 6-4, art 5. The AP arrow will stay pointed towards Team A’s basket, giving Team A the opportunity to make the next AP throw in.
|
I partially agree with your amendment. Because currently, if following the kick ball, the next attempted throw-in resulted a held ball due to the A1 placing the ball through the plane and B1 tying him up, yes Team B would have the resulting AP throw-in.
But I think your revision should read:
...Team A would then be awarded a throw in as a result of the kicking violation by Team B, and would not lose the arrow since they did not commit a violation, as references in Rule 6-4, art 5. The resulting throw-in would still be considered an AP throw-in and the arrow will change when this throw-in ends.