Thread: Tattoos?
View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2007, 02:02pm
HawkeyeCubP HawkeyeCubP is offline
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by armymanjones
If a tatoo was vulgar or offensive I would require it to be covered up and would use the rule as being inappropriate
AMJ -

I think you would have to avoid using the word "offensive," and use only the word "vulgar" if you were to do so in talking with the player/coach, per 4-19-4, as it would directly contradict the NFHS repealed rule JRut mentioned, assuming the word "offensive" was the language used in the rule.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
There was a NF rule about 8 years ago that outlawed tattoos that would be considered offensive or profane.
Reply With Quote